Which doctrine justified racial segregation in the United States during the Jim Crow era?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $25.99Unlock all

Study for the U.S. Immigration, Labor, and Political Movements Test of the late 1800s to early 1900s. Learn with comprehensive questions and detailed explanations. Master your exam preparation!

Multiple Choice

Which doctrine justified racial segregation in the United States during the Jim Crow era?

Explanation:
Separate but Equal is the doctrine that justified racial segregation during the Jim Crow era. It held that state laws could require the separation of races in public facilities as long as the separate facilities were equal in quality. This standard came from the Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and provided a legal basis for segregating schools, trains, restrooms, and other public services across the South. In reality, the facilities were not equal, and the policy enforced unequal treatment under a veneer of legality. The doctrine remained in effect until Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which ruled that separate facilities are inherently unequal and therefore unconstitutional. The other ideas don’t justify segregation: Popular Sovereignty involved who decides about slavery in new territories, Manifest Destiny concerned U.S. expansion, and Civil Rights refers to seeking equal rights, not justifying segregation.

Separate but Equal is the doctrine that justified racial segregation during the Jim Crow era. It held that state laws could require the separation of races in public facilities as long as the separate facilities were equal in quality. This standard came from the Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and provided a legal basis for segregating schools, trains, restrooms, and other public services across the South. In reality, the facilities were not equal, and the policy enforced unequal treatment under a veneer of legality. The doctrine remained in effect until Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which ruled that separate facilities are inherently unequal and therefore unconstitutional. The other ideas don’t justify segregation: Popular Sovereignty involved who decides about slavery in new territories, Manifest Destiny concerned U.S. expansion, and Civil Rights refers to seeking equal rights, not justifying segregation.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy